You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Buckby > Thirza Buckby (1837 - )

Desborough People
Thirza Buckby


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   1297 1.0 Thirza Buckbyfemale
1291 Father: George Buckby    bap. 25 Mar 1804 at Desborough
1292 Mother: Martha Marlow    b. 28 Aug 1808 at Desborough
Birth: about 1837, at DesboroughCensus


Blind Census 1901, aged 64

Census Details: at Desborough in 1841 1851 1861 1871 1881 1891 1901 -:-
Married: David Croft  1856BMD
Birth: about 1858, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus
Married: Theresa [not known]  before 1878Est. from child
b. about 1858, at Liverpool, LancashireCensus

   46083.1 George Croftmale
Birth: about 1878, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 13 Apr 1884 at DesboroughIGI

   46093.2 Eliza Croftfemale
Birth: about 1883, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 10 Jul 1891 at DesboroughIGI

   46103.3 Harry Croftmale
Birth: about 1884, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 13 Apr 1884 at DesboroughIGI

   46113.4 William Croftmale
Birth: about 1888, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 10 Jul 1891 at DesboroughIGI



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page