Desborough People
John Dunkley
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
16229
1.0 John Dunkleymale
Birth: about 1801, at Rothwell, Northamptonshire
CensusPedigree
16230Married:
Mary [not known]
b. about 1806, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1831, at Rothwell, Northamptonshire
Census4684Married:
Mary Ann Sharp
about 1856
BMD
b. about 1829, at Rockingham, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1847, at Rockingham, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1852, at Corby, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1857, at Corby, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1858, at DesboroughCensus
Birth: about 1860, at Cotterstock, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1862, at Kings Cliffe, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1863, at Kings Cliffe, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: 02 Dec 1864, at Desborough
IGI
Death: 08 Oct 1931
IGI
Birth: about 1867, at Stamford, LincolnshireCensus
Birth: about 1869, at Stamford, LincolnshireCensus
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page