You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Coe > Mary Jane Coe (1873 - )

Desborough People
Mary Jane Coe

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   3442 1.0 Mary Jane Coefemale
963 Father: George Crick Coe    b. about 1844 at Desborough
212 Mother: Sarah Ann Freer    b. about 1847 at Desborough
Birth: about 1873, at DesboroughCensus

Pedigree
   3330
Married: (1) George William Ginns  about 1896BMD
b. about 1873, at DesboroughCensus

   92152.1 Lilian Ginnsfemale
Birth: about 1897, at DesboroughCensus

   17547
Married: (2) John Law  1901BMD
b. about 1873, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus

   175482.1 Ronald Lawmale
Birth: about 1903, at DesboroughCensus

   175492.2 Evelyn Lawfemale
Birth: about 1905, at DesboroughCensus

   175502.3 Horace Lawmale
Birth: about 1907, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus

   175512.4 Ida Lawfemale
Birth: about 1909, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page