You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Dainty > Mary Ann Dainty (1868 - 1934)

Desborough People
Mary Ann Dainty


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   5745 1.0 Mary Ann Daintyfemale
16656 Father: Samuel Dainty   b. about 1829 at Rothwell, Northamptonshire
16657 Mother: Elizabeth Smith   b. about 1834 at Rothwell, Northamptonshire
Birth: about 1868, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus
Death: 12 Apr 1934, age: 66yProbate
Probate: 03 May 1934  executors, etc

Married: John George Groocock Coe  1887BMD
b. about 1865, at Desborough

   57462.1 Alfred Coemale
Birth: about 1890, at DesboroughCensus
Death: about 1951, age: 61y. BMD

   92372.2 Annie Elsie Coefemale
Birth: about 1892, at DesboroughCensus

   92382.3 Lilly E Coefemale
Birth: about 1894, at DesboroughCensus

   92392.4 Florence Mary Coefemale
Birth: about 1896, at DesboroughCensus

   92362.5 Arthur William Coemale
Birth: about Dec 1900, at DesboroughCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page