You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Berridge > Jabez Berridge (1860 - )

Desborough People
Jabez Berridge


Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:


   5925 1.0 Jabez Berridgemale
5929 Father: Frank Berridge    b. about 1824 at Great Catworth, Huntingdonshire
5930 Mother: Mary A Currington    b. about 1835 at Great Catworth, Huntingdonshire
Birth: about 1860, at Great Catworth, HuntingdonshireCensus

Married: Emma Wareing  1883BMD
b. about 1859, at Badby, NorthamptonshireCensus

   59262.1 Lily Berridgefemale
Birth: about 1884, at DesboroughCensus

   59272.2 Ernest Berridgemale
Birth: about 1885, at DesboroughCensus

   59282.3 Arthur Berridgemale
Birth: about 1886, at DesboroughCensus

   169032.4 Harry Berridgemale
Birth: about 1893, at Chapel Brampton, NorthamptonshireCensus
Baptism: 28 May 1893 at DesboroughIGI

   169042.5 Francis John Berridgemale
Birth: about 1898, at Chapel Brampton, NorthamptonshireCensus



The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.

Source Codes

top of page