You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Ward > Charlotte Ward (1861 - )

Desborough People
Charlotte Ward

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   9266 1.0 Charlotte Wardfemale

Birth: about 1861, at Narborough, LeicestershireCensus

Pedigree
   9265
Married: George Luck  1882BMD
b. about 1864, at London

   92672.1 Mabel Luckfemale
Birth: about 1884, at Leicester, LeicestershireCensus

   92682.2 George H Luckmale
Birth: about 1887, at Wigston, LeicestershireCensus

   92692.3 Gertrude E Luckfemale
Birth: about 1889, at Grantham, LincolnshireCensus

   92702.4 Ethel Alice Luckfemale
Birth: about 1893, at DesboroughCensus
Death: 07 Jun 1904, at Desborough, age: 11y. Mercury

Additional Information: BMD Announcements

Census Details: at Desborough in 1901 -:-

   92712.5 Frederick G Luckmale
Birth: about 1897, at DesboroughCensus

   92722.6 Archibald Luckmale
Birth: about Mar 1901, at DesboroughCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page