You are here: Family History > Surname > Cormack > Kezia Cormack (1852 - )

Kezia Cormack

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   1458 1.0 Kezia Cormackfemale
231 Father: James Cormack (born about Mar 1822 at Woodford, Essex ) Census
232 Mother: Sarah Ann Wood (born about 1825 at Loughton, Essex ) Census
Birth: about 1852, at Loughton, EssexBMD

Pedigree

Additional information: Marriage Cert 1874 

Census Details: 1861 1871 1881 1891 1901
   1817
Married: (1) Henry Thomas Brown  at Parish Church, Clapham, London 16 Apr 1874Mrg Cert
b. about 1850  d. before 1881

   18232.1 Henry Brownmale
Birth: about 1876Census

Census Details: 1881

   18212.2 Arthur Brownmale
Birth: about 1878, at MiddlesexCensus

Census Details: 1881

   1822
Married: (2) Adam Wood  before 1876Est. from child
b. about 1830, at Abridge, Essex  d. 1909

   18552.3 William Woodmale
Birth: about 1876, at Camden, LondonCensus

Census Details: 1891

   18562.4 Charles Woodmale
Birth: about 1890, at Limehouse, LondonCensus

Census Details: 1891 1901

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears like, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page